Jump to content

Gravity Jim

Member
  • Posts

    302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Gravity Jim's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. I remember this bitten-off attitude among the regulars here the last time I switched over to Logic, and I see the people and the attitudes have not changed. I guess every forum suffers from some form of haughtiness from the old guard... people say MOTUNation is the same way. I’ll just leave all opinions to the experts. “Objective,” my ass.
  2. Well, you don’t have to get insulting about it, Ploki. I use it, you don’t. Good enough?
  3. Absolutely. I use it on scores for video games to create pads and textured atmospheres, so I’m a fan.
  4. There is nothing like Omnisphere. It's the bomb dot com.
  5. Let me contrast two amps in my studio. First is the Fezzter Prince G., a clone of a tweed Fender Princeton. It has three tubes in it (once 12ax7 for a preamp, one 6L6 for power), and when you crank it, the overdrive you hear is primarily one tube, the 12ax7, being overdriven (power tube overdrive is possible, but you have to dime the amp). This kind of overdrive is crunchy, "hairy," the classic rock and roll OD sound. The other amp is a Fuchs Overdrive Supreme 50, a Dumble clone. Instead of adding gain all at once at just one point in the circuit, the ODS introduces gain at several points along the circuit. Depending on how you set the controls, you can get a huge amount of gain at the output without ever really blasting any one tube... so the result is a long, singing, smooth sustain with very little "grit." This sound is associated with jazz-blues guitarists like Larry Carlton and Robben Ford. The difference is in what the amp allows you to do in terms of gain staging.
  6. You'll find models for them in a Kemper. Dumble-Style amps (Fuchs ODS, Two-Rock, Bludotone, etc.) feature multistage gain management, and produce an overdrive that is smooth, singing and hairless. Very different from the crunchy Fender/Marshall-style OD that you hear from most amplifiers.
  7. I'm confused... are you saying that Logic fails to give you a count in, or that you want to record data during the count-in?
  8. Logic Pro will reproduce exactly as much low end information as you can produce. Your problem is elsewhere in the chain. Unless what you're talking about is not getting the kinds of lows from an electric bass that you get from a synthesizer. That's just the nature of the two instruments.... synths can produce bass frequencies much, much lower than a bass guitar can.
  9. It’s the main thing I miss from DP.
  10. I think the Kemper does what it does just fine, but with the exception of “Dumble” style amps, all overdriven guitar amps sound similar. That said, I agree that a real tube amp sounds better.
  11. What are you describing when you say "robotic?" Distortion? A "ringing?" A slight delay? Digital hash?
  12. It's really there. I just updated my copy of Logic.
  13. Has anyone tried the Touché expression controller? If so, what do you think? Have you played the physically modeled strings? What about mapping it to, say, Omnisphere?
  14. Then why does OP keep posting that he wishes Apple would fix this? That doesn’t sound like someone trying to find the problem.
  15. I’m saying that the scanning behavior is anomalous, and if it’s happening then something is eliminating your AU prefs.
×
×
  • Create New...